What a Dave Hansen Vicotry Won't Tell Us

We may be living in an age when all politics is national, but reality remains very much a local phenomenon.  The reality in Wisconsin's 30th Senate district is that Democratic incumbent Dave Hansen is likely to defeat Republican challenger David VanderLeest in Tuesday's election.

This will be the first of the actual recall elections and a Hansen victory will likely be heralded as a sign that the tide in Wisconsin is firmly behind the Democrats, and pushing against Governor Scott Walker.  All I can say to this is don't believe it.  The only thing that a Hansen victory will tell us is that the voters of the 30th don't want to be represented by VanderLeest. 

While many voters in the district appreciate VanderLeest's efforts in the Hansen recall effort, the problems in his personal life are simply too numerous, too troubling, and too recent for many voters to consider sending him to Madison.

Does this mean that Wisconsin voters approve of the fact that Hansen and his Democratic colleagues in the Senate fled to Illinois in order to block the Governor's collective bargaining bill? I doubt it.  The plural of anecdote is not data, but many people I talk to are still quite upset at what they see as this ridiculous ploy which literally shut down the legislature of this state, at least on fiscal matters.  These days, such complaints are almost always immediately followed by another about Republican John Nygren, and his failure to get on the ballot to challenge Hansen.

The WisGOP has turned grassroots anger over Hansen's flight into a $243,000 mistake. That is how much Hansen reported in cash on hand recently.  Compare that to VanderLeest's $2000 raised.  As the Recess Supervisor notes:

But what I suspect is happening here is that the Democrats, who are already winning the fundraising war, are going to try and use this race as an exclamation point to get their donors pumped for the real races next month.

Right on cue, Chris Bowers is up at Kos with a post that ends in an appeal to contribute to the Democrats in the Wisconsin recalls.  The link he provides is to ActBlue, the fundraising clearinghouse where donors from all over the country can make small contributions to elections that do not even affect them.  I can imagine Democrats from Florida to Oregon heeding the call and then watching the results come in on Tuesday.  At that distance, they will be apt to read all sorts of things into a Hansen victory that simply aren't there. 

If I could send a message to these donors it would be this:  Democrats in Wisconsin and at the national level are happy for you to misread Tuesday's results.  This confusion sustains a flood of campaign cash unleashed initially by your anger over Scott Walker's policies, but don't kid yourself.  A sizable portion of Dave Hansen's constituents approve of the Governor's policies and were infuriated when Hansen fled to Illinois.  The state GOP failed spectacularly to capitalize on this sentiment, leaving Hansen to fend off a challenge from a flawed opponent.

That's the local reality.  Too bad it will be totally eclipsed by the national politics of Tuesday's election.

David VanderLeest, Duke of Wisconsin

Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies)^[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990^[2] which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 (100%)."

Elsewhere, the otherwise erudite Illusory Tenant compares VanderLeest to David Duke:

Remember when Scott Walker went on the teevee to "debate" the racist David Duke, arguing that the white supremacist should be banned from the Republican presidential primary ballot? ... how come Walker isn't going after the VanderLeest Dave like he went after the Duke Dave?  

Duke is the nation's most notorious politician when it comes to matters of race. Do Wisconsin Democrats really fear David VanderLeest so much that they feel the need to draw a comparison with Duke?

Taken in isolation this might just be chalked up an anomaly, but on the heels of Graeme Zielinski's so-called "communications" via Twitter and the latest attack ad that can be seen over at Capper's place I can only conclude they are either worried or bored.

All of this underscores the point that the Wisconsin GOP has squandered a golden opportunity.  An incumbent Democratic Senator whose district went for Obama 56-42 is reduced to mounting a state wide coordinated campaign against an opponent who at best is a flawed candidate with ongoing personal issues.

Maybe Dave Hansen couldn't have been beaten by anybody in this climate, but a serious challenge could have exposed just how weak his support is.  Democrats around the country may applaud his flight to Illinois as courageous, but plenty of voters in the district see it for what it is:  Hansen participating in a ridiculous conspiracy to shut down the Wisconsin legislature and deprive the citizens of this state representation in Madison.

Update:  The Press Gazette details VanderLeest's various legal troubles.  They cast serious doubt on whether anyone should vote for him.  My favorite line though was that Senator, "Hansen shied away from questions about his opponent."  Of course he did, he has people for that!

Mike Tate Hearts Dave VanderLeest

OR:  How to make a WisDems press release:  Just add hominy.

DPW Chariman Mike Tate comes in for no small amount of abuse from the right, and from what I've seen most of it deserved.  Tate's not quite a Steve Kagen-esque gaffe generator, but he can bring the stupid with the best of them.

While many of us in NE WI are still scratching our heads over John Nygren's nearly inexplicable ability to get enough signatures to get on the ballot, the WisDems have wasted no time in attacking the only guy who had the wherewithal to get on the ballot, Dave VanderLeest.

WisDems communications director Graeme Zielinski has been all a-Twitter attacking VanderLeest today.  His insights, such as they are, range from the bizarre (does VanderLeest really have an affinity for a now defunct malt beverage Zima?) to the potentially slanderous when he describes VanderLeest as Governor Walker's "wife-beating lieutenant" (if only VanderLeest had retained Tom Foley, Esquire, as council, the certified mail would go out tomorrow).

In fact, Zielinski has been so prolific tonight, I can't help but wonder if it isn't easy to produce non-substantive juvenile attacks on one's political opponents:  Zielinski's Twitter profile says he is a former writer for The Onion, now I know why every WisDems press release headline sounds like a joke.

Oh it was really easy after all.